Judicious choices

Mark Silverstein

at 250 WPM

3h 12m

The average reader, reading at a speed of 250 WPM, would take 3h 12m to read Judicious choices.

Personalise your estimate by entering your reading speed below

Test my reading speed

7

days at 30 min/day

192

total minutes

Buy on Amazon

Judicious choices

by Mark Silverstein

March 1995

W. W. Norton & Company

192

9780393964493

0393964493

Description

The announcement of Justice Blackman's retirement from the Supreme Court could have hurled the president, the Senate, and American society into a potentially divisive search for a new nominee to the Court. Rather than simply choosing the best possible candidate, the president instead compiles lists and weighs the political cost of pushing each candidate through the Senate and on to the Court. Mark Silverstein's Judicious Choices: The New Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations takes a close look at the politics behind the confirmation process and the transformations of this process from a simple voice vote of the Senate to a tortured political spectacle. The televised confirmation hearings on the nominations of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court captivated public attention and were among the most noteworthy domestic events in recent years. They were, however, only the most spectacular examples of the new politics of Supreme Court confirmations. Since the defeat of Abe Fortas in 1968, the process of selecting and confirming nominees to the Supreme Court has shifted from tightly controlled, leadership-dominated deference to presidential choice to a thoroughly democratized process, shaped by extraordinary public participation and media coverage. It has become, in short, a process that reflects the best and worst of modern American politics. . Arguing that the modern judicial confirmation process is the result of changes in the larger political setting, Judicious Choices provides the reader with a unique perspective on American politics during the last quarter-century. Focusing on the fundamental shifts in the structure of national electoral politics as well as the expansion of judicial power, this book details the evolving political context surrounding the process of selecting and confirming our most important judges. It's all politics, and Professor Silverstein helps the reader better appreciate why nominees to the Court are subject to the crucible of modern participatory democracy.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pages are in Judicious choices?

This edition of Judicious choices has approximately 192 pages. Please note, this is an estimate and the exact page count can vary between hardcover, paperback, and e-book versions.

How long does it take to read Judicious choices?

For most readers, Judicious choices typically takes between 4h 0m and 2h 40m to complete. This is based on the book's length of approximately 48,000 words and common reading speeds.

Here's a detailed breakdown: • Continuous reading at 250 WPM: approximately 3h 12m of focused reading • Casual reading (30 minutes/day): you could finish in roughly 7 days • Estimated word count: 48,000 words

Your individual reading time will vary based on your personal reading pace, the amount of daily reading time, and your familiarity with the subject matter.

What is the word count of Judicious choices?

The estimated word count for Judicious choices is approximately 48,000 words. This figure is calculated using industry-standard methods that consider genre-specific word density patterns, typical formatting and layout characteristics, and standard words-per-page ratios for published books.

This is an approximation — actual word count may vary based on font size, formatting, edition, and the presence of illustrations or charts.

Who is the author of Judicious choices?

Judicious choices was written by Mark Silverstein.

When was Judicious choices published?

The publication date for this specific edition is March 1995. The original work may have been published on a different date.