Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent?
Guilherme Rizzo Amaral
Reading Time
at 250 WPM3h 15m
The average reader, reading at a speed of 250 WPM, would take 3h 15m to read Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent?.
Personalise your estimate by entering your reading speed below
Test my reading speedEnter speed in words per minute
7
days at 30 min/day
195
total minutes
Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent?
Published
2018
Publisher
Wildy, Simmonds & Hill
Pages
195
ISBN-13
9780854902576
Description
"One of the cornerstones of arbitration is the finality of arbitral awards. Saving rare exceptions, arbitral awards cannot be subject to challenges based on the arbitrator's errors of law. Furthermore, there is no hierarchy between arbitral tribunals and judicial courts, nor are arbitrators part of any judicial system. Thus, if arbitrators are not part of any hierarchical scheme and if there is no challenge or appeal available against their errors of law, how could one say that arbitrators have a duty to follow judicial precedents? Besides, when individuals agree to solve their disputes outside the judicial arena, should they expect a private arbitrator to abide by the same standards of a system they have just avoided? Is the choice for arbitration not a choice for an entirely different legal system, unbound by the so-called judge-made law? This book attempts to answer those questions by presenting a comprehensive guide to the relation between judicial precedents and arbitration in the United States, the United Kingdom and in Brazil, as well as in international arbitration as a whole"--Back cover.
Subjects
Arbitration and award
Lawsuits and Awards
The law of arbitration and awards
The law of arbitration and award
A treatise on commercial arbitrations and awards
Interpretation, revision, and other recourse from international judgments and awards
Frequently Asked Questions
How many pages are in Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent??
This edition of Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent? has approximately 195 pages. Please note, this is an estimate and the exact page count can vary between hardcover, paperback, and e-book versions.
How long does it take to read Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent??
For most readers, Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent? typically takes between 4h 4m and 2h 43m to complete. This is based on the book's length of approximately 48,750 words and common reading speeds.
Here's a detailed breakdown: • Continuous reading at 250 WPM: approximately 3h 15m of focused reading • Casual reading (30 minutes/day): you could finish in roughly 7 days • Estimated word count: 48,750 words
Your individual reading time will vary based on your personal reading pace, the amount of daily reading time, and your familiarity with the subject matter.
What is the word count of Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent??
The estimated word count for Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent? is approximately 48,750 words. This figure is calculated using industry-standard methods that consider genre-specific word density patterns, typical formatting and layout characteristics, and standard words-per-page ratios for published books.
This is an approximation — actual word count may vary based on font size, formatting, edition, and the presence of illustrations or charts.
Who is the author of Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent??
Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent? was written by Guilherme Rizzo Amaral.
When was Judicial Precedent and Arbitration - Are Arbitrators Bound by Judicial Precedent? published?
The publication date for this specific edition is 2018. The original work may have been published on a different date.