Development of Double Entry

Christopher Nobes

at 250 WPM

2h 40m

The average reader, reading at a speed of 250 WPM, would take 2h 40m to read Development of Double Entry.

Personalise your estimate by entering your reading speed below

Test my reading speed

6

days at 30 min/day

160

total minutes

Buy on Amazon

Development of Double Entry

by Christopher Nobes

2013

Taylor & Francis Group

160

9781317974314

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pages are in Development of Double Entry?

This edition of Development of Double Entry has approximately 160 pages. Please note, this is an estimate and the exact page count can vary between hardcover, paperback, and e-book versions.

How long does it take to read Development of Double Entry?

For most readers, Development of Double Entry typically takes between 3h 20m and 2h 13m to complete. This is based on the book's length of approximately 40,000 words and common reading speeds.

Here's a detailed breakdown: • Continuous reading at 250 WPM: approximately 2h 40m of focused reading • Casual reading (30 minutes/day): you could finish in roughly 6 days • Estimated word count: 40,000 words

Your individual reading time will vary based on your personal reading pace, the amount of daily reading time, and your familiarity with the subject matter.

What is the word count of Development of Double Entry?

The estimated word count for Development of Double Entry is approximately 40,000 words. This figure is calculated using industry-standard methods that consider genre-specific word density patterns, typical formatting and layout characteristics, and standard words-per-page ratios for published books.

This is an approximation — actual word count may vary based on font size, formatting, edition, and the presence of illustrations or charts.

Who is the author of Development of Double Entry?

Development of Double Entry was written by Christopher Nobes.

When was Development of Double Entry published?

The publication date for this specific edition is 2013. The original work may have been published on a different date.