Age differences in word and language processing
Philip A. Allen
Reading Time
at 250 WPM7h 34m
The average reader, reading at a speed of 250 WPM, would take 7h 34m to read Age differences in word and language processing.
Personalise your estimate by entering your reading speed below
Test my reading speedEnter speed in words per minute
16
days at 30 min/day
454
total minutes
Age differences in word and language processing
Published
1995
Publisher
Elsevier
Pages
454
ISBN-10
0444817662
Description
Component cognitive processes have played a critical role in the development of experimental aging research and theory in psychology as attested by articles published on this theme. However, in the last five to ten years, there has been a substantial increase in the number of articles attempting to isolate a single factor (or small subset of factors) responsible for age differences in information processing. This view of aging is frequently termed the complexity model of the generalized slowing model, the primary assumption being that age differences in cognition are due simply to a relatively larger performance decrement on the part of older adults (compared to younger adults) as task complexity increases. Because generalized complexity theorists have questioned the utility of using component cognitive processes as theoretical constructs, the editors feel it is time to restate why component cognitive processes are critical to any thorough understanding of age differences in cognition. Thus the present edited volume represents an attempt to demonstrate the utility of the process-specific approach to cognitive aging. Central to this effort are illustrations of how regression analyses may provide evidence for general slowing by maximizing explained variance while at the same time obscuring local sources of variance. The book concentrates on age differences in word and language processing, because these factors relate to reading which is a critical cognitive process used in everyday life. Furthermore, age differences in word and language processing illustrate the importance of taking component cognitive processes into consideration. The breadth of coverage of the book attests to the wide range of cognitive processes involved in word and language processing.
Subjects
Frequently Asked Questions
How many pages are in Age differences in word and language processing?
This edition of Age differences in word and language processing has approximately 454 pages. Please note, this is an estimate and the exact page count can vary between hardcover, paperback, and e-book versions.
How long does it take to read Age differences in word and language processing?
For most readers, Age differences in word and language processing typically takes between 9h 28m and 6h 18m to complete. This is based on the book's length of approximately 113,500 words and common reading speeds.
Here's a detailed breakdown: • Continuous reading at 250 WPM: approximately 7h 34m of focused reading • Casual reading (30 minutes/day): you could finish in roughly 16 days • Estimated word count: 113,500 words
Your individual reading time will vary based on your personal reading pace, the amount of daily reading time, and your familiarity with the subject matter.
What is the word count of Age differences in word and language processing?
The estimated word count for Age differences in word and language processing is approximately 113,500 words. This figure is calculated using industry-standard methods that consider genre-specific word density patterns, typical formatting and layout characteristics, and standard words-per-page ratios for published books.
This is an approximation — actual word count may vary based on font size, formatting, edition, and the presence of illustrations or charts.
Who is the author of Age differences in word and language processing?
Age differences in word and language processing was written by Philip A. Allen.
When was Age differences in word and language processing published?
The publication date for this specific edition is 1995. The original work may have been published on a different date.